- From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:46:40 -0800
- To: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
- Cc: Chris Mills <cmills@w3.org>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>, Paul Irish <paulirish@google.com>, Peter Lubbers <peterlubbers@google.com>
- Message-ID: <CAPwaZpVLqF6V+uWJGcyURY9P9wwGm82M6GePGMLF3z8NLnTrTw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi, Alex: > > I think we're close to final on Mike's example. > I'm sitting down to provide commentary on it momentarily, but more importantly I asked some Chrome Dev Rel folks to give their perspectives. I'd love to hear from them (hopefully soon) before we call it final. > If so, were you thinking we would pick 3-6 more properties to work > through at the meeting this Friday? > I think that sounds good, assuming folks who sign up for that task acknowledge that they have to rework these first articles as we zero in on the right style and organization. As a reminder, I have a one-time conflict with the meeting this Friday. Please continue pressing on on this project without me. :-) > And assign someone to start the guide or do you want to take that on? > I'd be happy for someone to take this off if they're up for it. > > Thanks. > > Julee > ---------------------------- > julee@adobe.com > @adobejulee > > From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> > Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:00 AM > To: Chris Mills <cmills@w3.org> > Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Mike Sierra < > letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Preliminary CSS Property Priorities > Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:00 AM > > > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Chris Mills <cmills@w3.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 23 Jan 2013, at 16:05, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On 22 Jan 2013, at 17:11, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: >> >> Cheers Alex! That was a lot of work yesterday ;-) >> >> >> >> Although I did say I might not be finished until Monday - I got up to >> about row 510, but the ones below I didn't get to. I would still like to >> look over these, just to record the specs each one is defined in, and add >> any other properties that may come to light from looking through the specs. >> This shouldn't take me long, but I want to check with you first before >> doing anything that changing the spreadsheet again won't muck up the >> calculations/processing you've applied to it. How is best to proceed here? >> >> >> >> Go ahead and edit the Manual Data page; you won't mess anything up. >> > >> > Awesome - I'll do this today. >> >> Ok, I've gone through the whole lot - ready to be signed off. >> >> So, next steps. Can we confirm that Mike's exemplary CSS page has been >> finished enough for me to start creating a few? > > > I think it makes sense for it to bake a bit, and to discuss it at this > week's content meeting (although unfortunately I won't be able to attend). > > >> Even if the template is not ready, I can create the text for a few pages. >> I'd like to get a feel for how long a page will take to do, and from that, >> wrk out how long I think this work will take us. >> >> What priority levels do we want to get done in this first phase of work? > > > I think the next stage of work will be more exploratory: working through > a few more CSS properties as we simultaneously write up the guide on how to > write a high-quality CSS Property article. > > Once we have that set, we can start divvying up the work among volunteers > and get going in earnest. > >
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 02:47:28 UTC