- From: Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:12:52 -0500
- To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Cc: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Yes, I was referring to all the implemented properties. I expect the CSS3 would be far more popular search topics, not the older core properties, but I appreciate the reasoning of starting with the latter. Perhaps it would be useful to add a CSS version flag for the criteria Chris mentions, with which to present a more manageable set of tables on the css/properties page. --Mike S On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: > Do you think Mike was referring to all the CSS properties, including all the proprietary non-standard browser stuff? That shouldn't be a part of the central task. > > Also, I could imagine the number being far higher than 80, if we choose to include all the properties from the nascent CSS3 modules, as well as the completed stuff. > > I think we need to think about how we are going to do this. Should we tackle it in subsets, with different prioriites? For example > > * Set 1: Everything defined in CSS 1/2.x > * Set 2: All CSS3 stuff that has at least two stable implentations > * Set 3: All CSS3 stuff that is a bit further off > * Set 4: All non standard CSS > > ? > > Chris Mills > Opera Software, dev.opera.com > W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org > Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M) > > On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:55, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Alex: >> >> This is exciting! A few minor things: >> • Do we have a date for this milestone? >> • Mike Sierra mentioned to me there are over 256 CSS properties, compiled from various browsers' lists of computed styles. So can you provide a clear criteria for what you're including in your list of ~80 CSS properties? Just a quick sentence about how you chose what you chose. >> • Can we say each page goes through at least one round of writing/tech review/copy editing? >> • A nice-to-have: in addition to the "representative property", a quick checklist for the writer to go through to ensure completion/conformity to ideal? (What makes it the property we chose to be representative?) >> Regards. >> >> J >> >> ---------------------------- >> julee@adobe.com >> @adobejulee >> >> From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> >> Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 6:20 PM >> To: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org> >> Subject: CSS Property Milestone Project Plan >> Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org> >> Resent-Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 6:21 PM >> >> Hi all, >> >> As discussed on the call on Tuesday, I propose that our first milestone be focused on making our CSS property pages in particular the best on the web. >> >> I've outline the high-level plan (including rationale) at http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Tasks/CSS_Property_Milestone . >> >> Please take a look and let me know what you think. On Friday I will begin enumerating the pages and start looking for the good representative article to help us set our guidelines. >> >> --Alex > >
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 18:13:23 UTC