- From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:29:25 -0800
- To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
- Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHZLcPrQGyo6Uw21+gzgHFBcsR575yJn+cZNLfGJLW2j38CGsw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jonathan, Looking really nice here! I've logged two Session bugs<http://project.webplatform.org/infrastructure/issues/open>to start the ball rolling on the infrastructure project. Also, we need a way to "subscribe to" or be "cc'd on" bugs so that we receive e-mail notifications when there are changes. I've created this issue<http://project.webplatform.org/prmg/issues/PRMG-4>to cover that enhancement request. +Scott On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote: > The Content component import is finished! You should now be able to use > the Content project [1] within the new solution to keep track of things. > Once again, if you have any issues using the new install or have any > questions, you can post them in the Project Management System project [2] > or get in touch with me any other way you can and I can help you out. > > Some things are currently left in the component on Bugzilla. This is > because they are going to be put into different projects which don't exist > yet. So hang tight if you want to talk about one that is left sitting. > > -Garbee > > [1] http://project.webplatform.org/content > [2] http://project.webplatform.org/prmg > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>wrote: > >> Thanks for the warning. ;-)**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Jonathan Garbee [mailto:jonathan@garbee.me] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:36 PM >> *To:* public-webplatform@w3.org >> *Subject:* Re: Project Management update.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> In a few minutes I am going to begin importing the Content component bugs >> from Bugzilla over to the new system. The way imports are going to work is >> I will import and bring over the initial description of an issue. If there >> are any other comments, I am going to do my best to bring the content from >> them over as well (on some that may have a lot of conversation, we will >> see. But I think most of those are resolved now.) As the issues are ported >> over, I am going to close them as "RESOLVED" and "MOVED" while also linking >> over to the new issue in our project management system. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> So, to anyone who is signed up for the bugzilla mailing list, get ready >> for inbox spamming! ;P**** >> >> ** ** >> >> -Garbee**** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> >> wrote:**** >> >> I think that is discussion for another thread/time. Right now it really >> doesn't matter since our install doesn't work with OpenID.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:19 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:**** >> >> Once MediaWiki supports OpenID, I see no reason to have any other login >> mechanism. We want to advocate open systems and secure practices, which is >> what OpenID is about, unless I am mistaken. >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> ☆*PhistucK***** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> >> wrote:**** >> >> That has been planned. The module for it needs some patches before we >> can use it. That is one of the bugs being imported into the new system. ;) >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> It would only go one-way, so once we get support for having TBG talk to >> the MW user base, we wouldn't use the OpenID system anymore since those >> users wouldn't be in the MW DB. Unless, if people signed up through TBG it >> would go into that DB, but I would be interested to see how that goes >> seeing how TBG stores the OpenID data.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:07 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:**** >> >> And what about making MediaWiki have OpenID support? >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> ☆*PhistucK***** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> >> wrote:**** >> >> The system uses its own user DB. There is no module for letting it work >> with a MediaWiki DB. It does have OpenID support, so this mitigates a bit >> of the frustrations with needing another account. Getting it to work with >> our current user DB is something to have done at some point.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> -Garbee**** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:42 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:**** >> >> How do I log in?**** >> >> My docs.webplatform.org username and password do not work. Is this >> intentional? Will this be fixed?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thank you for working on this! >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> ☆*PhistucK***** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> >> wrote:**** >> >> So, this is about to get inceptiony. Due to a bug in the current ACL >> setup for TBG, the "General" settings actually don't work as they should. >> :P So each project's permissions need to be manually set, which makes >> creating them more time consuming then I originally estimated. It won't be >> too bad though, just need to take them on one at a time compared to rushing >> through creating them all at once as initially planned.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Now, time for inception. I went ahead (completely without asking anyone) >> and setup a project for tracking issues with the bug genie install (yes, >> you can burn me at the stake for not asking, but let's do that after it is >> all configured.) It is public and located here ( >> http://project.webplatform.org/prmg .) The "prmg" in the URL is for >> "Project Management" and the actual title is "Project Management System." >> So, for any issues or questions about using the system, just post in there. >> There is one issue in particular currently which is about the import of the >> current projects located here ( >> http://project.webplatform.org/prmg/issues/PRMG-2 .) It has the list I >> am going to import the current projects in. Please comment if you have any >> suggestions or problems with the import order.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks,**** >> >> -Garbee**** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote: >> **** >> >> Looking good, Garbee!**** >> >> +Scott**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> >> wrote:**** >> >> So, here we are. The Bug Genie is installed at >> http://project.webplatform.org ! It is currently empty, so don't go >> rushing over just yet. I'm finishing up a project that I have been caught >> up in for about a month now within the next two days. So, Tuesday or >> Wednesday will be when I begin configuring our TBG install. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> I'm estimating that should take me about two work days to get done and >> test, perhaps three if I end up getting confused in the ACL (which is >> pretty easy to do.) After that I will begin importing the issues from the >> current Bugzilla repo into the new system. This will be done one component >> per day to try and not burn myself out in the move and to try and do some >> extra cleanup as well. As each component's move is completed I will update >> the list to know to start using TBG for those issues. As far as the order >> of the move, I will email out the order they will be done the day I start, >> needless to say Content and Infrastructure are on the top of my list.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Probably the biggest question, support/documentation for TBG. This, isn't >> a good answer I'm afraid. There is very little documentation on TBG's >> actual usage. So at first, it really is just ask me any questions you have >> via any method you can (coming to my house excluded, my dogs like to bark >> at new visitors and it drives me nuts.) I will work on documenting the >> actual usage of TBG first for us. Once that documentation is completed I >> will work on documenting administration aspects of usage. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> If anyone has any specific questions about this process, please just let >> me know. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks for your time,**** >> >> -Garbee**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 01:25:20 UTC