W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > February 2013

RE: How should we represent the status of a spec?

From: Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:18:29 +0000
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
CC: Julee <julee@adobe.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <b5a534f88da04022a275c262ae63a265@SN2PR03MB096.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

Received on Friday, 15 February 2013 17:21:44 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Janet Swisher: "Re: Call for participation: Communications & Outreach working group"
Previous message: Scott Rowe: "Re: An question aside (Re: A categorization/placing problem - event/property pages)"
In reply to: Tobie Langel: "Re: How should we represent the status of a spec?"
Next in thread: Julee: "Re: How should we represent the status of a spec?"
Reply: Julee: "Re: How should we represent the status of a spec?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:40 UTC