Re: How should we represent the status of a spec?

On 15/02/2013 10:00 , Tobie Langel wrote:
> Maybe we should start having a cross-project conversation on the subject.

I'm all for that, but I want to make sure that we don't force ourselves 
to shoehorn all the various ways of representing spec status into a 
single unified one if it turns out not to fit.

Spec status can be different to different users.

Hacker: can I actually use this?
Tester: is there a point in writing tests for this?
Standadista: this feature sucks, do I still have a window to change the 
spec?

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon