- From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:21:46 +0300
- To: pdsouza <pdsouza@about.com>
- Cc: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABc02_+fFT24w_gJt+ABMke4H4qoo1mjj1q0DQQNhgh9YzV3LQ@mail.gmail.com>
"document" and "window" are properties that represent the "Document" and "Window" objects, respectively. For correctness, I think we should use object names and not property names (despite the fact that they are known as their property counterparts instead). ☆*PhistucK* On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Patrick D'Souza <pdsouza@about.com> wrote: > Scott, > > Is there any specific reason to use Document instead of document in the > example below. I think lowercase document makes sense in this case > instead of Document. dom/apis/document/getElementById<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/dom/apis/document/getElementById> > proposed: dom/Document/getElementById<http://docs.webplatform.org/w/index.php?title=dom/Document/getElementById&action=edit&redlink=1>The same would apply to Window as well. > > I like this new structure and we should make sure that the breadcrumbs on > the page reflect this structure. But, before we go ahead with any proposed > changes to the structure of the urls, we should ensure that the old url > structures have a 301 in place until they are completely off Google's > index. A 301 would provide a good user experience as well for someone still > trying to access content via the old links. > > - Patrick > > > On 04/16/2013 12:16 PM, Scott Rowe wrote: > > Thanks to Julee, Patrick, and Ryan's fascinating site map, we have a > complete bird's-eye view of our content, which proved indispensable in > auditing our DOM API pages and formulating a plan for organizing them, > which I propose at the following location: > > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/DOM_API_docs > > To summarize, proposed is the following URL pattern in reorganizing the > DOM API docs: > > - dom/<object>/<member> (where <member> is either a <property> or > <method>) > - dom/events/<event> > > This means that all objects would reside on the same level, i.e. > "dom/Window," "dom/Document," etc. to provide for the shortest URLs > possible. Events are getting their own namespace because usually the event > target is a general DOM Element, and distinguishing events by their targets > does not add any useful information to the URLs. > > You'll notice that the structure is very similar to that of the API > Docs[1], except for the omission of <api name> interstitial, as in > "apis/webrtc" where "webrtc" is the name of an API_Listing page that > describes the common name of the API. These were necessary in the API docs > to avoid namespace collisions. They are not needed in the DOM API docs. > > Note also the absence of the "apis" interstitial. The more I thought > about it, the less convinced I was that we needed it. > > Have a look at the proposal and let me know what you think. > > ~Scott > > > [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/api_docs > > > -- > Patrick D'Souza Developer, Metrics About.com | Do more 1500 Broadway, 6th > Floor New York, NY, 10036 AIM: padsouza >
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 17:22:56 UTC