Re: Commenting UI?

Hi Julee,

I reduced their size by 22% and changed the non-hover color to make them more subtle. In addition, I styled them so that the text expands on hover to make their purpose clearer. What do you think?

Cheers,
Lea

Lea Verou
W3C developer relations
http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou






On Mar 27, 2013, at 02:16, Julee wrote:

> OK, that makes sense: integrated and actionable! The UI on them is a bit
> extreme, no? I was sitting next to someone using Safari. The visitor
> landed on the page, moved the cursor, and a big plus sign next to
> expanded. So, before the visitor could assess the page, comments became a
> dominant experience.
> 
> Shall I file a UI bug?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Julee
> 
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
> Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 4:18 PM
> To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
> Cc: julee <julee@adobe.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org"
> <public-webplatform@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Commenting UI?
> 
>> Hi, folks-
>> 
>> We decided to tie the commenting system into the issue tracker, via the
>> API. I believe Frozenice is looking into that.
>> 
>> Regards-
>> -Doug
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/26/13 4:14 PM, Scott Rowe wrote:
>>> FYI, Comments fared well in the survey [1].
>>> 
>>> 56% of respondents at the Berlin Doc Sprint said they would use Comments
>>> to communicate with the community.
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> 
>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Community/Survey/Doc_Sprint/Berlin_2
>>> -2013#Community_questions
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com
>>> <mailto:julee@adobe.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>    Hi, everyone:
>>> 
>>>    I was just looking at the main page. There are huge UI handles for
>>>    commenting. I thought we were turning off commenting, no?
>>> 
>>>    Thanks for any information.
>>> 
>>>    Julee
>>>    ----------------------------
>>>    julee@adobe.com <mailto:julee@adobe.com>
>>>    @adobejulee
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 19:14:03 UTC