- From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:37:00 -0700
- To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
- Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 22:37:51 UTC
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote: > I somehow ended up checking recent uploads and found this little treat > [1]. While funny, I am wondering if we should have some terms for > acceptable media that is uploaded to the site? I think we should ask > images be more professional than this. > Whoa, at first glance I thought that was a cat with a recent surgical wound (gross!). Other than that concern about this particular image, however, pictures that are a bit irreverent don't personally bother me. On the one hand, we want to create a credible site that professionals can trust. On the other, WPD is part of the internet ecosystem--an ecosystem that has a certain kind of irreverent humor. I'm *personally *fine with images that are irreverent as long as they aren't over the top or potentially offensive. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > -Garbee > > [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/**wiki/File:box_baco.jpg<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/File:box_baco.jpg> > >
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 22:37:51 UTC