- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:21:25 +0000
- To: "jonathan@garbee.me" <jonathan@garbee.me>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
On 10/11/12 7:30 PM, "jonathan@garbee.me" <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote: >We all need to decide what the purpose of the IRC and Q&A is. There has >been quite a bit of talk among people in IRC about what exactly we should >allow and not allow. Paul has brought this up earlier in his email about >just the IRC room, but this needs to be decided for that and the Q&A >along with any further avenue's that could be used. >First I feel it necessary to define two things so we are all on the same >page: > >* "Meta content" is content or questions that is specific to >webplatform.org and its documentation. >* "General content" is content or questions that don't specifically >relate to content from the site. > >For example: >A meta question: " How would I use HTML's Target attribute to open in a >new window?" (Ref: >http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/html/attributes/target ) >A general question: "How do I get Y jQuery plugin to work on my site?" Y >being http://pagescroller.com/ if you really need an example. That's not really how I understood the distinction between both. Example of a meta question: "Is anyone working on reviewing http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/html/attributes/target?" Example of a general question: "How would I use HTML's Target attribute to open in a new window?" (Ref: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/html/attributes/target) There absolutely needs to be a split between the channel for people working on the site and a channel for questions about the site's content. Answering questions in irc channels is exhausting and a poor use of resources which could be creating lasting content instead. --tobie
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 19:21:53 UTC