- From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 09:37:27 +1100
- To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>
- Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPwaZpU4=pwnkhhM-G+mvP9bmFo04X_eAFj2X7Jsw7cPPt5ROg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote: > Well, there should be an "about" page [1] since that issue has been > sitting for quite a while. That should be the "philosophy" if there is to > be a page for it. > > The more link also needs to go [2] since it is a UX nightmare. There is no > reason to have multiple links go to the same area in the same nav menu with > different names. Should it ever have a different name in any navigation > item? > > I also don't think we need a link to the stewards in the main navigation. > There is a block of text lower down in the page going to the stewards page > and then the footer logos on every page. > +1 > > [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19410<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19410> > [2] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19557<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19557> > > -Garbee > > > > On 12/7/2012 6:43 AM, Chris Mills wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> One action I got from the public meeting earlier in the week was to think >> about better things to link the main navigation items on webplatform.orgto. We currently have >> >> Docs Chat >> Q&A Tutorials >> Blog More >> >> Tutorials and More are rather redundant, given that tutorials are part of >> Docs, and More just points to Docs anyhow. >> >> Doug is probably right that it'd make the area look a bit crappy if we >> just removed them, leaving only four menu choices. I wonder if maybe we >> could do that just temporarily, and then add stuff in afterwards, when new >> things appear? >> >> Things we could immediately add: >> >> 1. A link to the stewards page, http://www.webplatform.org/**stewards/<http://www.webplatform.org/stewards/> >> 2. A link to our policies, and/or philosophy? Do we have a page that >> explains the WP philosophy? >> >> Things we are intending to have in the near future that w could add, but >> not immediately: >> >> 1. A link to education resources >> 2. A link to code examples. When Dabblet support gets added, perhaps we >> can add a page that just links to a directory of code examples. >> 3. A link to tutorial videos >> >> Any thoughts on this? Should we just leave it be for now? It just seems a >> shame to have redundant links on the homepage. >> >> >> Chris Mills >> Open standards evangelist and dev.opera.com editor, Opera Software >> Co-chair, web education community group, W3C >> Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://my.opera.com/** >> chrismills/blog/2012/07/12/**practical-css3-my-book-is-** >> finally-published<http://my.opera.com/chrismills/blog/2012/07/12/practical-css3-my-book-is-finally-published> >> ) >> >> * Try Opera: http://www.opera.com >> * Learn about the latest open standards technologies and techniques: >> http://dev.opera.com >> * Contribute to web education: http://www.w3.org/community/**webed/<http://www.w3.org/community/webed/> >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 22:38:15 UTC