- From: Maximiliano Firtman <firtman@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:11:12 -0300
- To: Ronald Mansveld <ronald@ronaldmansveld.nl>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, public-webplatform-tests@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAP=p0OkyRUtHB6-wh-zbrHp3WRHpzyb2B+SLURRQUD+3aEJ-7w@mail.gmail.com>
Ronald, I wasn't saying that we should use WURFL, I said that they have solved this same problem before, identifying browser/device combinations. Anyway, if there is enough interest on WURFL somehow -AGPL license- , I can contact Luca Passani -CEO of the company behind WURFL-, I know him personally and I think he may be able to help if we need something from his experience on this topic. Usually, on mobile UA-strings are not enough but it depends on what we want to achieve. Max On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Ronald Mansveld <ronald@ronaldmansveld.nl>wrote: > > > Maximiliano Firtman schreef op 2013-10-18 16:09: > > Hi! I'm not dutch, but the Queen (consorte) Máxima of the Netherlands >> was born in Argentina, my home country ;) >> >> About browser identification, on mobile it's usually a mess. Some >> examples: >> >> 1) Chrome on iOS (in terms of compatibility) is the iOS Web View, >> that is 99.9% the same as Safari - it doesn't deserve a mention by >> itself but it's clearly not the same as Chrome on Android >> 2) Android default browser is not even the same on different devices >> with the same Android OS -such as the browser in Samsung devices, or >> some Sony devices with WebGL support- >> 3) Naming is complicated as it was stated before in this thread. For >> example, "BlackBerry Browser" is basically a different browser in 6.x, >> 7.x, BB10 and the PlayBook tablet. The same problem applies to "Nokia >> Browser" >> >> I think WURFL already has a clever way to identify a combination of >> browser/device based on the user agent and it uses a hierarchy >> mechanism to provide default values for properties while some specific >> devices can override them. WURFL also has an identifier per >> browser/platform. Look at it may be a good idea. >> >> > I've checked WURFL, but their licensing seems to be completely > incompatible. As in: we're not allowed to use it, unless we get a license > for one of their tools to access the data. > But wouldn't UA-strings suffice for mobile as well? Cause I've got a hunch > that that's exactly what they base their data on. > > > Ronald >
Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 17:12:00 UTC