- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 23:35:02 -0400
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org
On 05/14/2015 10:59 AM, Joseph Potvin wrote: > The issue that I'm raising is that a "Payments Architecture" in > general is orthogonal to the "Architecture of the World Wide Web". Yes it is. > Any architecture for "web mediated payments" needs to reference a > Payments Architecture that is abstracted from whatever media are > employed. At a theoretical level, I agree with you. At a practical level, where is this abstracted "Payments Architecture" document that we can reference? ISO20022 is the only thing that comes close, IMHO, and even that is expressed as high-level Business Processes (which we intend to map to at some point), and not an "Architecture". > And any architecture for "web mediated e-commerce" needs to > reference an Commerce Architecture that is abstracted from whatever > media are employed. Where is this "Commerce Architecture" documented? Here's where I think consensus in the Web Payments IG is right now (but don't take it as anything other than my personal opinion): * Other groups exist that create Financial Industry standards as well as standards that affect the financial industry. * Other groups exist that create laws that regulate the Financial Industry. * The WPIG will liaise with those groups where it makes sense to do so. For example, we actively pursued a formal liaison relationship between the group and ISO as well as ANSI / X9 for the financial industry standards. * The WPIG doesn't want to re-invent the wheel and will re-use existing standards where it makes sense to do so. * The WPIG would like to avoid slowing the work down by requiring agreement across multiple standard setting organizations to make progress. This is a balance and we're trying to get real work done on a fantastically aggressive timeframe. We're supposed to be "done" with the first cut of the architecture by September 2015. Getting deeply involved in standards setting organizations that take a decade per cycle is largely a non-starter. We re-use the work they have, but have no hope of being able to steer the ISO/ITU ship on any time frame that is relevant to the speed at which the Web moves. I also don't think there is a single "Payments Architecture" document out there that we could refer to, so I don't think what you're asking for is possible. I may be wrong, and if I am, please point us to this general "Payments Architecture" document. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
Received on Friday, 15 May 2015 03:35:27 UTC