- From: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:56:17 -0400
- To: Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKcXiSoKZ1rTxvYwukW8todNdnXYrTObZV6-hKFW-_m2vpmtWQ@mail.gmail.com>
<tangential comment> RE: "I also have some bitcoin "testnet" coins that could be used to test settlement. They are worthless coins but otherwise will all the same properties of btc." Spotted at https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Testnet "Testnet2 was just the first testnet reset with a different genesis block, because people were starting to trade testnet coins for real money." The difference between one and the other is, um... Here's a potentially useful benchmark for the "real" BTC: http://www.numbeo.com/common/motivation_and_methodology.jsp ... more on this coming soon, at a very generic level, here: https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Use_Cases_Task_Force#Choosing_the_Attributes_of_Price Drafting under way. </tangential comment> Joseph Potvin On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 12 March 2015 at 05:21, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > >> To clarify a bit more... >> >> On 03/06/2015 04:19 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> > I would like to implement a payment processor in line with the w3c >> > payments spec >> >> Keep in mind that there is no such thing as a "W3C Payments Spec" right >> now. I know you know that Melvin, but others on the list might get the >> wrong idea. >> >> There are Web Payments /Community Group/ specifications, many of them >> incomplete or in need of updating, but with implementations. >> >> There are no Web Payments /Interest Group/ or /Working Group/ >> specifications yet. We're working through the details now of use cases, >> roadmap, and Web Payments Architecture (Payment Agent). Expect First >> Public Working Drafts of those in the coming months. >> >> > I was wondering if anyone else is working on something similar >> > because I'd like to test payments from one processor to another, and >> > it doesnt seem clear how to do that right now. Perhaps with some >> > running code the problem would be easier to break down. >> >> There is currently no mechanism to do cross-payment processor clearing. >> Payment Processors could use Ripple, centralized continuous clearing, or >> some other blockchain-like mechanism to clear payments between each >> other. Not having this spec'd right now is problematic, and we really do >> need to sort out the details here. >> >> > Just trying to establish tentatively if anyone may be willing to help >> > test in the short to medium term. >> >> +1, willing to test... but before we can do that, we need to settle on >> the protocol (which is a non-trivial undertaking). >> > > +1 to everything > > My hope was that through running code it might be easier to come to a > consensus. > > Perhaps we could have a wiki page for people that would like to test, > similar to : > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html > > I think we may need a clearing system like ripple or ACH > > I also have some bitcoin "testnet" coins that could be used to test > settlement. They are worthless coins but otherwise will all the same > properties of btc. > > >> >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments >> http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/ >> >> > --
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 11:57:08 UTC