- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:36:14 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On 2014-10-20 08:11, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 10/20/2014 01:36 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/2014/04/payments/webpayments_charter.html >> "Development of technical standards is not in scope for the Interest >> Group" >> >> Since recommending somebody else's solutions (including WPCG's) >> would be politically impossible, the only realistic deliverable >> appears to be a set of requirements for actors to consider when >> selecting a specific solution. > > The deliverables of the WPIG are outlined here: > > http://www.w3.org/2014/04/payments/webpayments_charter.html#deliverables > > Having been through this process a few times, I can almost guarantee > that the output will look similar to these two documents: > > https://web-payments.org/specs/source/use-cases/ > > https://web-payments.org/specs/source/roadmap/ > > Those documents will then be taken and handed off to task forces that > will be asked to figure out what set of technologies to put together to > achieve the results. If gaps in the Web Platform are found, new > technical working groups will be created to fill those gaps. > > There seems to be confusion around the purpose of the Web Payments IG. > It does not exist to invent or create new technology. Rather, it exists > to define use cases, requirements, and possibly a roadmap. Only after > those items are done will the group be able to analyze if existing > technology could be used, or new technology is required for the Web > Platform. Here's the order of operations: > > 1. Web Payments Workshop (March 2014) > 2. Web Payments Activity Charter Creation (June-Oct 2014) > 3. Web Payments IG (Oct 2014-?? 2015) > 4. Various Task Forces related to payments/credentials > 5. Potentially new Technical WGs for payments/credentials (2015-2018) > > We're on step #3 right now, and have a long way to go to get past step #5. It is possible that the W3C work takes another route and that is using WebCrypto as a lever into the payment jungle. After all, huge resources and time have been invested in this work-item by the bowser-vendors and if WebCrypto can't do payments it would be close to a failure. The outcome of WebCrypto.Next will be the tipping point. Currently there's nothing on the table so at this stage all bets are off. Anders > > -- manu >
Received on Monday, 20 October 2014 06:36:47 UTC