Re: Programmable Distributed Governance

On the "spamming" note I've heard that Bitcoin core will probably switch to
data compression and/or links to off blockchain data, so I think that will
be less of a concern with time.

As for "the web," I see it as much more closely related to anything that
currently is currently contractual in nature and requires some sort of
legal involvement. Anything that can be handled in a "programmable
contract" is likely to be much more cost-efficient than going through teams
of lawyers.

re: OT, the ethereum people said pretty much the same thing. Ether as oil;
Bitcoin as gold.

Jd


Joel Dietz
Founder and CEO
Evergreen | evr.gr | @fractastical <http://www.twitter.com/fractastical> |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xGdTV_UMOg&hd=1


On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Melvin Carvalho
<melvincarvalho@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> On 27 January 2014 23:03, Joel Dietz <jd@evr.gr> wrote:
>
>>
>> I wanted to share this whitepaper for feedback, largely sparked by the
>> introduction of evolution of DAC layers on cryptocurrencies.
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/fractastical/distributed-governance/blob/master/whitepaper.md
>>
>
> Im curious has to how this relates to the Web (if at all)
>
> I could imagine a system where you incorporate on the block chain.  Your
> company number is the transaction hash, and you have a pointer to a web
> page.  The web page then points back to the transaction.
>
> Following your nose, you can add more web based content to your initial
> starting point ...
>
> This also saves "spamming" the block chain and increased fees
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Joel Dietz
>> Founder and CEO
>> Evergreen | evr.gr | @fractastical <http://www.twitter.com/fractastical>|
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xGdTV_UMOg&hd=1
>>
>
>