- From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:10:39 -0800
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org
On 1/10/14 1:55 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > 3. Is there anything in the charter that should be re-worded? Charter seems good to me -- except one major (and one minor) concern. Major Concern: The emphasis on ‘technologies’ in both Goals and Scope, and explicit statement that ‘economic or political theory’ is out of scope, leaves the entire Charter open to be used as a platform by existing corporate or government bodies for their own ends without due attention to what has been, to this point, an important goal and operating principle of the group: using web technology to make direct financial transactions between individuals as easy as those between groups and organizations. I don’t believe this is intentional, but I believe the wording in Goals is insufficient to make this clear at present. I suggest that a small change to the second sentence in the ‘Goals’ section can address this (suggested section in brackets): "The goal is to create safe, decentralized systems and sets of open, patent and royalty-free technologies that allow [both individual people and organizations] on the Web to send each other money as easily as they exchange instant messages and e-mail today." Minor concern: At the end of the last sentence in “Goals”, I believe it reads more logically if you cut the last “the”, since you aren’t discussing two particular technologies and you might have more than two submitted at once. I suggest it would read: “...or a clear differentiation emerging between [] two technologies.” Steven Rowat
Received on Saturday, 11 January 2014 00:11:04 UTC