On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote: > In general the two reasons I think it's important to proactively revisit > the resilience of intellectual rights management around both this spec and > reference implementation source code are: > (a) Their success would be really significant, so will attract well-funded > attention (not all of it desireable) > (b) Expanded intellectual rights provisions in the new generation of trade > agreements can make otherwise minor oversights on seemingly esoteric > pedantic distinctions terribly significant in legal eyes. FWIW, I believe the second point is worth discussion. Not sure when this happened (or why) but <http://www.w3.org/IPR/> appears to have been replaced by the privacy activity (per the page maintenance note). -- Scott Elcomb @psema4 http://psema4.com/pubkey.txt http://www.pirateparty.ca/Received on Wednesday, 1 January 2014 20:26:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:07:27 UTC