- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 15:55:30 -0500
- To: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On 01/01/2014 02:03 PM, Joseph Potvin wrote: > Thanks Manu, and happy new year. I'll find this important and useful > to explore and discuss, but I'm not sure if details on these > considerations will be sufficiently interesting to others on this > list to discuss within this venue. Should this be considered in > another particular venue, or in an email sub-thread? The points you raise are W3C Process issues, which the following community discusses at length: http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/ Let's move this conversation over there as W3C Process issues have very little to do with web payments. > reference implementation source code Keep in mind that reference implementations are not a requirement of the W3C process, demonstration of interoperability is (usually against a test suite). Typically, reference implementations pop up at some point during the process. Digital Bazaar /may/ publish their implementation as a reference implementation, but that presumes too many things at this point in time (agreement that PaySwarm should be the base technology, agreement from W3C member companies on that direction, the W3C working group charter, patent issues, etc.). -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Worlds First Web Payments Workshop http://www.w3.org/2013/10/payments/
Received on Wednesday, 1 January 2014 20:55:53 UTC