- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:54:38 -0500
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54A1955E.2020008@openlinksw.com>
On 12/28/14 2:05 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: > In addition, I don't even think the idea using HTTP 402 actually buys > you anything since it > has no meaning in a browser (and thus for the user) which means that > there must always be > a *proxy* involved which does the actual work. If 402 has no meaning in the browser, how does 200 magically have meaning to said browser? I remain quite confused about your understanding of Web Architecture. A browser is one kind of HTTP User Agent. That's it! -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 29 December 2014 17:55:01 UTC