Re: Useful discussions Re: P2P Payments

On 2014-12-05 15:13, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:

I'm sorry to hear that you think that
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webpayments/2014Dec/0016.html
is trolling.  It was not intentional at least.

Cheers,
Anders

> Anders,
>
> 05.12.2014, 16:51, "Anders Rundgren" <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>:
>> On 2014-12-05 14:29, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>>   On 12/4/14 2:48 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote:
>>>>   P2P payments are established in many places in the world.  My guess is
>>>>   that none of these are based on standard web technology because this
>>>>   technology simply isn't up to such tasks; it will take many years to
>>>>   get on par with "Apps", if even possible.
>>>>
>>>>   It is sad but the web is lagging and the lag is increasing due to the
>>>>   success of Android and iOS.
>>>>
>>>>   Anders (on Android)
>>>   What does "Standard Web Technology" mean?
>>
>> To simplify the discussion a bit: The web does not support client-based
>> cryptographic keys (except through HTTPS CCA which doesn't not sign data).
>
> This sentence is the first useful contribution you made in this thread, on your third message. It seems to have started as simply trolling.
>
> It would be really helpful if you would try to provide concrete statements explaining things which are missing, or explanations of use cases perhaps accompanied by explanations of how other systems meet them.
>
> Statements along the lines of "you guys are useless and the Web doesn't work" are a waste of everyone's time.
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>

Received on Friday, 5 December 2014 14:21:54 UTC