W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webpayments@w3.org > November 2012

Re: the terms for to and from

From: Andrew Miller <amiller@cs.ucf.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:19:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF7tpEwH4j045SJL2pXV_jGeBF+bO6ve=yaD3QsWCaZrfbfo9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pelle Braendgaard <pelle@stakeventures.com>
Cc: opentransact@googlegroups.com, Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
Is there a "via"

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Pelle Braendgaard
<pelle@stakeventures.com> wrote:
> I've always argued it is more intuitive and follows other similar email
> standards, which is why we use it in OpenTransact.
>
> I think the PaySwarm community expressed some openness to change to that at
> some point.
>
> P
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I've been looking at the terms "to" and "from" wrt a transfer in
>> webcredits / opentransact / payswarm and pingback ongologies
>>
>> Payswarm uses
>>
>> source
>> destination
>>
>> Opentransact uses
>>
>> to
>> from
>>
>> Pingback uses
>>
>> source
>> target
>>
>> There's a slight complexity in that pingback has a "to" field to which is
>> your pingback service.  So there's possible collisions of named query
>> variables a theoretical possibility.
>>
>> Of these 3 I think that "to" and "from" are the most intuitive, due to
>> similarity to email / sms etc.
>>
>> I'm considering changing web credits to use these fields.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://picomoney.com - A whole new kind of money
> http://payglo.be - Blog about payments from a global perspective
>



-- 
Andrew Miller
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:20:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:07:21 UTC