- From: Pelle Braendgaard <pelle@stakeventures.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:11:22 -0500
- To: opentransact@googlegroups.com
- Cc: Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:11:54 UTC
I've always argued it is more intuitive and follows other similar email standards, which is why we use it in OpenTransact. I think the PaySwarm community expressed some openness to change to that at some point. P On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>wrote: > I've been looking at the terms "to" and "from" wrt a transfer in > webcredits / opentransact / payswarm and pingback ongologies > > Payswarm uses > > source > destination > > Opentransact uses > > to > from > > Pingback uses > > source > target > > There's a slight complexity in that pingback has a "to" field to which is > your pingback service. So there's possible collisions of named query > variables a theoretical possibility. > > Of these 3 I think that "to" and "from" are the most intuitive, due to > similarity to email / sms etc. > > I'm considering changing web credits to use these fields. > > Any thoughts? > > -- http://picomoney.com - A whole new kind of money http://payglo.be - Blog about payments from a global perspective
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:11:54 UTC