Re: the terms for to and from

via would be the one to use if it's necessary.

I personally can't see the need for it though in a TCP/IP world where
everything is in theory directly connected.

That said I don't understand all the web credits use cases.

P




On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Andrew Miller <amiller@cs.ucf.edu> wrote:

> Is there a "via"
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Pelle Braendgaard
> <pelle@stakeventures.com> wrote:
> > I've always argued it is more intuitive and follows other similar email
> > standards, which is why we use it in OpenTransact.
> >
> > I think the PaySwarm community expressed some openness to change to that
> at
> > some point.
> >
> > P
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Melvin Carvalho <
> melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I've been looking at the terms "to" and "from" wrt a transfer in
> >> webcredits / opentransact / payswarm and pingback ongologies
> >>
> >> Payswarm uses
> >>
> >> source
> >> destination
> >>
> >> Opentransact uses
> >>
> >> to
> >> from
> >>
> >> Pingback uses
> >>
> >> source
> >> target
> >>
> >> There's a slight complexity in that pingback has a "to" field to which
> is
> >> your pingback service.  So there's possible collisions of named query
> >> variables a theoretical possibility.
> >>
> >> Of these 3 I think that "to" and "from" are the most intuitive, due to
> >> similarity to email / sms etc.
> >>
> >> I'm considering changing web credits to use these fields.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://picomoney.com - A whole new kind of money
> > http://payglo.be - Blog about payments from a global perspective
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Miller
>



-- 
http://picomoney.com - A whole new kind of money
http://payglo.be - Blog about payments from a global perspective