Re: [w3c/payment-request] Some clarifications with Payment Request API (#774)

Thanks to everyone who responded to my queries patiently. I agree with everyone that this proposal is in the early stages of implementation and might change based on the interoperability of browsers in the future. 

The key takeaways from this conversation are:

1. While Payment Request API is foolproof to handle all the supported methods, it is good to follow specific vendor implementations to take advantage of their branding and popularity (e.g. Google Pay and Apple Pay)

2. You will also take advantage of vendor implementation to support their payment method on a non supported browsers (e.g Google Pay.js implementation on Firefox)

3. You might end up doing different implementations for different payment providers and some may not be with Payment Request API (e.g. Google Pay/Apple Pay through their implementation whereas basic-cards, Samsung Pay and Microsoft Pay can be through Payment Request API)






-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/issues/774#issuecomment-420428275

Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2018 21:16:27 UTC