- From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:31:11 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/536/review/45738729@github.com>
ianbjacobs commented on this pull request. > - <a>payment method identifiers</a> given <var>identifiers</var>. - For each resulting payment handler, if payment method specific - capabilities supplied by the payment handler match those provided - by <var>data</var>, the payment handler matches. + <li>Let <var>data</var> be the result of <a data-cite= + "!ECMA-262-2015#sec-json.parse">JSON-parsing</a> the second + element in <var>paymentMethod</var> tuple. + </li> + <li>If required by the specification that defines the + <var>identifer</var>, then <a data-cite= + "!WEBIDL#dfn-convert-ecmascript-to-idl-value">convert</a> + <var>data</var> to an IDL value. Otherwise, <a data-cite= + "!WEBIDL#dfn-convert-ecmascript-to-idl-value">convert</a> to + <a data-cite="!WEBIDL#idl-object">object</a>. + </li> + <li>If conversion results in an error, reject I understand Adrian to be distinguishing two possible behaviors in the face of invalid data: - Abandon that particular payment method identifier/data pair or - Abandon the entire payment request I favor the former behavior (and think AdrianHB does). Ian -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/536#discussion_r123526443
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2017 14:31:43 UTC