- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:18:17 -0500
- To: Jean-Yves Rossi <jean-yves.rossi@cantonconsulting.fr>
- Cc: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>, Kenneth Mealey <Kenneth.Mealey@aexp.com>, David Ezell <David_E3@verifone.com>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>, "Dapeng Liu (Max) (max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com)" <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com>
> On Jun 19, 2017, at 3:27 AM, Jean-Yves Rossi <jean-yves.rossi@cantonconsulting.fr> wrote: > > CANTON Consulting supports the proposal and suggests minor amendments: > • in 1.1 Liaise : "regulatory bodies" instead of "regulatory agencies" (the word "Agency" is quite specific to the US organization) > • In part 2. : we similarly suggest to change "regulatory bodies, (...) and central banks" in " standards bodies, regulatory agencies, > > consumer groups, and trade organizations. Examples include EMVCo, the PCI Security Council, ISO 20022 and other committees, the FIDO Alliance, GSMA, GS1, UN/CEFACT, and regulatory bodies (agencies, central banks, ...) " > (BTW, there no reason why central banks should be in the scope, besides being in charge to regulate payment activity) Hi Jean-Yves, I have changed “agencies” to “agencies/bodies” in the hopes of resonating with more people. If that is cumbersome, I have no objection to simplifying it to “bodies.” (However, I note that the EBA Web site [1] says it is "An agency of the European Union.”) Regarding your other change, I did not add “regulatory bodies (agencies, central banks, …)” because "regulatory agencies/bodies” are listed earlier in the bullet item. I did add, however, US Federal Reserve and EBA. Let me know if that works for you. Thanks! Ian [1] http://www.eba.europa.eu/ -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 16:18:29 UTC