Extended until 5pm ET on 23 June [Was: Call for Consensus to Request Member Review of Commerce IG Charter - Please Respond by 19 June]

Hello,

Today David Ezell approved an extension of the CfC review period until 5pm ET on 23 June. There was
also consensus on the call today [1] to give provisional IG approval to the charter in light of comments
so far. Final approval will depend on the feedback received through the new deadline. 

I will make some editorial changes to the draft charter [2] based on feedback.

Thank you,

Ian

[1] https://www.w3.org/2017/06/19-wpay-minutes#item01
[2] https://www.w3.org/2017/03/commerce-charter.html

> On Jun 12, 2017, at 9:07 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Web Payments Interest Group Participants,
> 
> The charter of the Web Payments Interest Group [1] expires 30 September 2017. 
> Since the March face-to-face meeting [2], we have been developing a new
> charter with an expanded scope.
> 
> This is a Call for Consensus to determine whether the Interest Group supports 
> the W3C Director requesting Membership review [3] of:
> 
>   Commerce Interest Group Charter
>   https://www.w3.org/2017/03/commerce-charter.html
> 
> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 9am ET on 19 June.
> 
> For the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/04/payments/webpayments_charter.html
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/03/22-wpay-minutes#item08
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#CharterReview
> 
> =========
> PROPOSAL: That the Web Payments Interest Group request that the W3C Director
>                      propose the above charter to the W3C Membership.
> 
> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
> 
> 1. Support the proposal.
> 
> 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even
>   if suggested changes are not taken into account.
> 
> 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal
>   unless the changes are taken into account.
> 
> 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
> 
> 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Interest Group.
> 
> 6. Abstain.
> 
> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
> 
> If there is strong consensus by 19 June (9am ET) for the proposal,
> it will carry.
> 
> If there are objections or proposals for substantive changes we will
> try to resolve them and start a new Call for Consensus.
> 
> ====================
> Regarding Formal Objections
> 
> * If you do not support the charter and you wish your lack of support
> to be communicated to the W3C Director and reviewed, please include
> the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION” [4] in your response. Be sure to
> include substantive arguments or rationale.
> 
> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection [4].
> 
> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
> individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that 
> would address the concern and increase consensus to advance the
> charter.
> 
> [4] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#Consensus
> 
> ============================
> Next steps if the Proposal carries
> 
> If the proposal carries, the W3C Management Team will review and
> complete the draft charter (e.g., by adding information about chairs
> and team contacts and charter end date).
> 
> If the W3C Management Team approves the charter, they will initiate a
> 4-week review by the W3C Membership.
> 
> Our goal is to launch the Commerce IG by mid-September and to hold a
> Face-to-Face meeting during TPAC 2017. (This would take the place
> of the Web Payments IG Face-to-Face meeting.)
> 
> For more about chartering operations, see:
> https://www.w3.org/Guide/Charter.html
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel: +1 718 260 9447

Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 16:12:03 UTC