Re: Call for Consensus to Request Member Review of Commerce IG Charter - Please Respond by 19 June

On 06/12/2017 10:07 AM, Ian Jacobs wrote:
> Commerce Interest Group Charter 
> https://www.w3.org/2017/03/commerce-charter.html

> PROPOSAL: That the Web Payments Interest Group request that the W3C 
> Director propose the above charter to the W3C Membership.

Digital Bazaar supports the proposal.

There are minor syntactic nits with the charter that need to be cleaned
up at some point:

> fulfill the Vision and Web developers to the broader community and 
> central banks

Missing period at end of sentence.

> including B2B and P2P)

Extraneous closing parenthesis.

> the different positions (whether held by W3C members or other members
> of the group) will be considered together.

It is unclear what end result this is hinting at. Perhaps "will be
reported to W3C Management/AC for consideration". What's the decision
model when there is conflict?

> on the topic

Should it be plural? "topics"?

> their obligation

Repeat of "obligation", perhaps clean up language with "their duty" or
"their responsibility".

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built
http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/

Received on Monday, 12 June 2017 17:42:09 UTC