- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:08:33 -0500
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On 06/12/2017 10:07 AM, Ian Jacobs wrote: >> Commerce Interest Group Charter >> https://www.w3.org/2017/03/commerce-charter.html > >> PROPOSAL: That the Web Payments Interest Group request that the W3C >> Director propose the above charter to the W3C Membership. > > Digital Bazaar supports the proposal. Thanks, Manu. I’ve made your small editorial fixes in place. Other notes below. >> the different positions (whether held by W3C members or other members >> of the group) will be considered together. > > It is unclear what end result this is hinting at. Perhaps "will be > reported to W3C Management/AC for consideration". What's the decision > model when there is conflict? That text is copied from the IG’s current charter. In case of conflict we follow the overall W3C Process model: https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#managing-dissent > >> their obligation > > Repeat of "obligation", perhaps clean up language with "their duty" or > "their responsibility”. That text is also boilerplate text. We only very reluctantly change the boilerplate text of WG and IG charters because lawyers have said “Please don’t change the text anymore so that we don’t have to spend time reviewing the next text.” Ian -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2017 14:08:41 UTC