On 6/7/16 8:00 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> 1. If you propose something, make sure that you're the champion for
> that term. Don't suggest something that you wouldn't want as the #1
> pick.
Based on Manu's interesting rules of voting, I hereby retract "Reader". I only proposed it yesterday and would need to consider it my #1, and make a case against the others.
But seeing David Chadwick's explanation for "Relying Party", which I accept, I now prefer that term.
I suggest ignoring "Reader" in the considerations and voting unless someone else decides to champion it with new reasoning.
Steven
> 2. If you propose something, make an argument for the use of that term
> and an argument against all of the other terms.
> 3. Don't send "me too" emails. If you want to weigh in, please make
> sure you're making an argument that no one else has made in order to
> cut down on the number of emails sent to the mailing list.
>
> We are going to collect input until midnight on Thursday and put up two
> Generalized Instant Runoff Voting[1] polls on Friday. The polls will be
> open for a week and will determine the final terminology we'll use
> across all of the documents.
>
> -- manu
>
> [1]https://www.opavote.com/methods#instant-runoff-voting
>