- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 21:21:30 -0400
- To: public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
- Cc: drummond@respectnetwork.net
On 06/08/2016 11:13 AM, Steven Rowat wrote: > On 6/7/16 8:00 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: >> 1. If you propose something, make sure that you're the champion >> for that term. Don't suggest something that you wouldn't want as >> the #1 pick. I'm forwarding a comment Drummond mentioned as a side-bar during a conversation to the list to make sure it gets a fair shake during the vote. Drummond Reed wrote: The term we've been using for relying parties isn't "consumer" or "inspector" but "acceptor" for three reasons: * It's a single word (like "issuer" and "holder"). * It pairs nicely with "issuer". * It's a simple word that everyone understands and shouldn't be confused with any other industry terms (that I know of). -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 01:21:56 UTC