Re: Request for terminology input - consumer/inspector/TBD Credential

"Relying Party" is acceptable to me. “Consumer” would probably be better if the credential were generated by a “Producer”.

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

> On Jun 8, 2016, at 8:07 AM, Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net> wrote:
> 
> On 6/7/16 8:00 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> 1. If you propose something, make sure that you're the champion for
>>  that term. Don't suggest something that you wouldn't want as the #1
>>  pick.
> 
> Based on Manu's interesting rules of voting, I hereby retract "Reader". I only proposed it yesterday and would need to consider it my #1, and make a case against the others.
> 
> But seeing David Chadwick's explanation for "Relying Party", which I accept, I now prefer that term.
> 
> I suggest ignoring "Reader" in the considerations and voting unless someone else decides to champion it with new reasoning.
> 
> Steven
> 
> 
>> 2. If you propose something, make an argument for the use of that term
>>  and an argument against all of the other terms.
>> 3. Don't send "me too" emails. If you want to weigh in, please make
>>  sure you're making an argument that no one else has made in order to
>>  cut down on the number of emails sent to the mailing list.
>> 
>> We are going to collect input until midnight on Thursday and put up two
>> Generalized Instant Runoff Voting[1] polls on Friday. The polls will be
>> open for a week and will determine the final terminology we'll use
>> across all of the documents.
>> 
>> -- manu
>> 
>> [1]https://www.opavote.com/methods#instant-runoff-voting
>> 
>