Re: (draft) Verifiable Claims Task Force Final Report and Presentation

i wanted to note that the call is usually at about 2am AU time, which has made it difficult to be a valued contributor on that schedule.

So whilst i have not been on the call on many occassions, i do review the calls and maintain a keen interest in the progress of this work.

I hope to contribute more meaningfully overtime.

tim.

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 3:54 PM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote:
On 02/14/2016 08:12 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote:
> Given the timing of its availability and of the the call tomorrow
> (plus the fact that some people may not be able to attend due to the
>  US holiday), I would like to request that there be no group
> decisions tomorrow, only an introduction to the report.

Agreed (to no group decisions).

The conversation tomorrow was going to focus more on "is this what the
group was expecting to see, and does it paint a compelling picture for
the Web Payments IG's involvement?"

If the answer to either of those questions is "No", then I expect the
discussion to try and discover what needs to be changed in the report,
presentation, or use cases.

-- manu

--
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice
https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/ <https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/>