- From: 孙倩(雪迪) <sunqian.sq@alibaba-inc.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:33:10 +0800
- To: <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>, "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Message-ID: <008101d09461$8e06e720$aa14b560$@alibaba-inc.com>
Dear Manu, We have a suggestion for supplement as following marked yellow: l Authentication n FIDO-based authentication Working Group u Strong authentication of payer to account provider (Biometrics Authentication and Multi-factor Authentication) u May have a dependency on WebAppSec work n Hardware-based authentication Working Group l Privacy IG n Privacy protection for sensitive information -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Manu Sporny [mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com] 发送时间: 2015年5月22日 12:25 收件人: Web Payments IG 主题: [payment arch] Roadmap We need a sanity check on the Roadmap document from folks in this group. It's very basic right now, mostly to test out the structure and the presentation format. The Roadmap is proposed through version 1: <https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Roadmap> https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Roadmap Feedback that would be helpful at this point: 1. After reading it, do you have a general idea of what we're trying to accomplish in version 1? 2. What sections did you find most helpful? 3. What sections should we do without? 4. Are there any sections that are missing? 5. Other thoughts? -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments <http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/> http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 07:33:54 UTC