Looks like a nice balance to me. Charles? * katie * Katie Haritos-Shea @ GMAIL On Mar 30, 2015 10:09 PM, "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 03/29/2015 05:28 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: > >> > https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-ig/commit/fc8c0a2277b1fe80f9813e9be26991c5fe49a7be > > > >> Note that this is tricky, since we want to reduce payment > > "friction". > > > > I suspect the way this plays out is that where we do introduce > > something like that, we allow things like limit-setting (so many > > transactions, with such-and-such a cap, for a given time period…). > > Note that this has also been considered important in areas like harm > > minimisation for gambling systems, as well as being a fairly common > > practice in managing corporate spending where thresholds are set for > > reporting requirements (analagously to legal cash transaction > > reporting requirements as it happens). > > Some text has been added to attempt to clarify some of your point, Chaals: > > > https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-ig/commit/55ea650d78a046cd3a8b2a8f33f6ca3999da4322 > > The rest of your point will most likely be made via the pending use > cases that will most likely go in after the FPWD that include things > like "budgets" (aka limit-setting / harm-minimization). > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments > http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2015 02:35:42 UTC