Re: Wallets

No objections to the second change.

The placement of the wallet text is intentional so that the term is defined
before describing the flow. I'd leave it where it is.

On 9 July 2015 at 06:52, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> On 07/08/2015 10:47 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie wrote:
> > I think wallets are central to the work of this WG. I hear you that
> > we need to ensure we don't take design decisions that neglect the
> > other stuff that is important to the wider IG but let's just say
> > that in the charter and not pretend that this WG is less focused than
> > it really is.
>
> I'm failing miserably at conveying the nuance of my points. Let's try a
> proposal in diff-marked format:
>
> 1. Move Wallets down in the scope section:
>
> http://manu.sporny.org/tmp/wpig/payments-wg-charter-manu-1.diff.html
>
> 2. Change the wording a bit to give the WG more design flexibility.
>
> http://manu.sporny.org/tmp/wpig/payments-wg-charter-manu-2.diff.html
>
> Would anyone object to just those two changes?
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice
> https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/
>
>
>