Re: Merchants, Mobile Operators, Banks, Browser Makers: Help us prioritize the Interest Group's work

Apologies Nick for not including WorldPay!

I agree Mountie, I'd suggest that you, Kepeng and Nick co-ordinate a
nonbank payments services provider stakeholder group. I'm happy to help as
that is my background

On 20 August 2015 at 02:14, Mountie Lee <mountie@paygate.net> wrote:

> PSP like PayGate is Non-Bank Group.
> the Banking industry and non-Bank industry are quite different.
> I think we are not belong to Banks.
>
> how worldpay think for this?
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I'd second David's suggestion that there should be a group representing
>> all of the payment service providers that aren't banks. There were enough
>> represented in NYC (PayGate, Dwolla, Visa etc spring to mind) and we have
>> participation from Alipay now.
>>
>> @Mountie/Kepeng: Is this a stakeholder group you could co-ordinate?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19 August 2015 at 19:50, David Jackson <david.dj.jackson@oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Understood.  Thanks for the remediation ...
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Jackson | Senior Director Financial Services
>>> Mobile: +16145601237 | VOIP: +16144656654
>>> Oracle Global Industry Solutions Group
>>> New York City | Columbus, Ohio
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 1:50 PM
>>> To: David Jackson
>>> Cc: Web Payments IG
>>> Subject: Re: Merchants, Mobile Operators, Banks, Browser Makers: Help us
>>> prioritize the Interest Group's work
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Aug 19, 2015, at 12:47 PM, David Jackson <
>>> david.dj.jackson@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Would eCommerce software platform providers be covered in these
>>> > stakeholder groups? My thinking is that there in web commerce software
>>> > vendors to understand their role in payments processing on-behalf of
>>> > others …
>>>
>>> I would like the groups to self-organize. I pitched a few that came to
>>> mind to start the conversation. By all means the participants should
>>> organize in a way that allows them to create the clearest statement of
>>> interests and priorities.
>>>
>>> Of course one organization could be in multiple groups.
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > David Jackson | Senior Director Financial Services
>>> > Mobile: +16145601237 | VOIP: +16144656654 Oracle Global Industry
>>> > Solutions Group New York City | Columbus, Ohio
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 1:43 PM
>>> > To: Web Payments IG
>>> > Subject: Merchants, Mobile Operators, Banks, Browser Makers: Help us
>>> > prioritize the Interest Group's work
>>> >
>>> > Hi Web Payments IG,
>>> >
>>> > Here’s an idea for helping to prioritize the IG’s work, and for
>>> building (part of) the agenda for the October face-to-face meeting:
>>> > we organize “stakeholder groups” to see whether there are consensus
>>> views on stakeholder priorities. Here are the groups that come to mind for
>>> me (but feel free to expand):
>>> >
>>> >       - Merchants
>>> >       - Mobile operators
>>> >       - Banks
>>> >       - Browser makers
>>> >
>>> > Here’s a plan for getting written perspectives by Sapporo:
>>> >
>>> > * This week: People who are interested developing “priorities” from a
>>> stakeholder perspective raise their hands on this list.
>>> >
>>> > * Week of 24 August: We organize a 30-minute call with those
>>> interested to start the discussion, and in that call we find
>>> >    a champion for that group. The champion continues discussions with
>>> the group (which can also happen on this mailing list
>>> >    if people wish) to develop the perspectives. Also, champions
>>> can/should create pages in our wiki [1] for notes and consensus
>>> >    points.
>>> >
>>> > * Week of 5 September: We hear from each champion on the 5 September
>>> call, what the highlights are. We provide feedback,
>>> >   that the champions incorporate into their materials. Each group then
>>> continues to flesh out its perspectives as far as it needs
>>> >   in the wiki.
>>> >
>>> > * At the face-to-face meeting we hear from each stakeholder group as
>>> part of determining next priorities for the IG.
>>> >
>>> > David, let’s discuss this at our 24 August call.
>>> >
>>> > Thank you,
>>> >
>>> > Ian
>>> >
>>> > [1] https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page
>>> > --
>>> > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>>> > Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>>> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mountie Lee
>
> PayGate
> CTO, CISSP
> Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
> E-Mail : mountie@paygate.net
>
>