- From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:53:17 +0200
- To: michael.f.uschold@boeing.com, public-webont-comments@w3.org
- cc: "Jones, David H" <david.h.jones@boeing.com>
Another comment from Mike Uschold <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>, passed on with his permission for the benefit of the list. > Here is the list of features of DAML+OIL that we identified as being most > likely to be useful for a database integration project. > > Recommend DAML-OIL language elements for use in II project: > daml:samePropertyAs > daml:sameClassAs > daml:sameIndividualAs > daml:inverseOf > daml:UnambigousProperty > daml:maxCardinality > daml:minCardinality > XML Schema datatype > Example: <xsd:decimal rdf:value="10.5"> > > Could ALSO be considered for use: > daml:Ontology > daml:cardinality > daml:versionInfo > daml:TransitiveProperty > daml:UniqueProperty Thanks a lot for this Mike, this is exactly the kind of datapoints that the WG so badly needs. After taking a first look: - all of your "must have"s are in OWL Lite, with the proviso that OWL Lite only allows 0-1 cardinality restrictions - all of your "might have"s are also in OWL Lite, with the same proviso - In [1], David Jones suggested that hasValue should also be a "must have", which is not in OWL Lite. Question: did you use other cardinality values than 0,1 in your data-integration projects? Thanks again for this very useful use-case input. Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh Department of AI, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam de Boelelaan 1081a, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel (+31)-20-444 7731/7700 fax (+31)-84-221 4294 [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2002Aug/0014.html
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 09:53:26 UTC