Re: Webizen progress and next meeting

On 8/4/2014 12:52 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 4, 2014 12:29 PM, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org 
> <mailto:jeff@w3.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks to all who participated in last Friday's call.
> >
> > The Doodle poll for the next call is at [1].
> >
> > The agenda is to review the inputs that people have been putting 
> into the wiki [2].
> >
> > Some of the more specific points to discuss:
> > We had good consensus on the Goals at the last call.  We should try 
> to finalize by this meeting.
> > We agreed to use the Twitter questionnaire as a means to assess what 
> should go into the program.  I've drafted a sample questionnaire.  I'm 
> not sure if we'll be able to conclude on this questionnaire at the 
> next meeting; but we probably need to get close and finalize it by the 
> following meeting.
> > Julian continues to look at getting us some professional help as well.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > [1] http://doodle.com/n8szipz24xxad5nz
> > [2] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen
>
> At the risk of sounding like a broken record, developers have no 
> first-class voice with regard to w3c matters, especially with regard 
> to direction in terms of TAG and AB  - at least for WGs we have 
> possibility for invited experts, but IEs have the same issue: while 
> granted status for WGs, they have no (even collective) representation. 
> I understand that some membership was opposed to this, but is it just 
> off the table?  I don't see anything in the survey even hinting at this.
>

In my book, nothing is off the table.  However, I am trying to represent 
where the task force currently is thinking.  No one in the task force 
indicated any interest in this at the last call, so I suppose it is off 
the table unless it gets traction in some way in the task force.