Re: Webizen progress and next meeting

On Aug 4, 2014 12:56 PM, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/4/2014 12:52 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Aug 4, 2014 12:29 PM, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks to all who participated in last Friday's call.
>> >
>> > The Doodle poll for the next call is at [1].
>> >
>> > The agenda is to review the inputs that people have been putting into
the wiki [2].
>> >
>> > Some of the more specific points to discuss:
>> > We had good consensus on the Goals at the last call.  We should try to
finalize by this meeting.
>> > We agreed to use the Twitter questionnaire as a means to assess what
should go into the program.  I've drafted a sample questionnaire.  I'm not
sure if we'll be able to conclude on this questionnaire at the next
meeting; but we probably need to get close and finalize it by the following
meeting.
>> > Julian continues to look at getting us some professional help as well.
>> >
>> > Jeff
>> >
>> > [1] http://doodle.com/n8szipz24xxad5nz
>> > [2] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen
>>
>> At the risk of sounding like a broken record, developers have no
first-class voice with regard to w3c matters, especially with regard to
direction in terms of TAG and AB  - at least for WGs we have possibility
for invited experts, but IEs have the same issue: while granted status for
WGs, they have no (even collective) representation. I understand that some
membership was opposed to this, but is it just off the table?  I don't see
anything in the survey even hinting at this.
>
>
> In my book, nothing is off the table.  However, I am trying to represent
where the task force currently is thinking.  No one in the task force
indicated any interest in this at the last call, so I suppose it is off the
table unless it gets traction in some way in the task force.
>
>
I'm pretty sure I did in irc on the last call?