- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 12:52:03 -0400
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: Webizen TF <public-webizen@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADC=+jfZ5iAR8_1tW7T9+AZ2=VXnxLvhOB7eWqps=nHBiRyJhw@mail.gmail.com>
On Aug 4, 2014 12:29 PM, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > > Thanks to all who participated in last Friday's call. > > The Doodle poll for the next call is at [1]. > > The agenda is to review the inputs that people have been putting into the wiki [2]. > > Some of the more specific points to discuss: > We had good consensus on the Goals at the last call. We should try to finalize by this meeting. > We agreed to use the Twitter questionnaire as a means to assess what should go into the program. I've drafted a sample questionnaire. I'm not sure if we'll be able to conclude on this questionnaire at the next meeting; but we probably need to get close and finalize it by the following meeting. > Julian continues to look at getting us some professional help as well. > > Jeff > > [1] http://doodle.com/n8szipz24xxad5nz > [2] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen At the risk of sounding like a broken record, developers have no first-class voice with regard to w3c matters, especially with regard to direction in terms of TAG and AB - at least for WGs we have possibility for invited experts, but IEs have the same issue: while granted status for WGs, they have no (even collective) representation. I understand that some membership was opposed to this, but is it just off the table? I don't see anything in the survey even hinting at this.
Received on Monday, 4 August 2014 16:52:31 UTC