- From: Wouter Termont <woutermont@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 17:41:48 +0100
- To: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM+hNO2O8DySKDXip1D+cNRwzPxHcO3nefytkHGoTj67gDu8Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Melvin, just letting you know I replied to your mail on github: https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3#issuecomment-1879750583. On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 8:18 AM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > Been having some interesting chats with Kingsley, and one route that he > has suggested to get to our goal of a modern webid set of specs would be to > drop Turtle=MUST > > I personally see this as something that would be hard to gain consensus on > because: > > 1. The spec is already in use > 2. Solid is at least loosely based on this work > 3. Dropping MUST means that there is no guaranteed interop, potentially > degrading the UX in some systems > 4. Timbl might not be in favour of such a change > > I could be completely wrong on any or all of these things, but I thought > I'd ask the group, so that we spend our time on the things with best chance > of proceeding > > If we can rule this path out then I think we have a relatively easy task > of defining a webid, writing examples and tests, then have multiple > profiles based on that shared understanding, of which WebID ED 2015, can be > one > > In short, I think we're 90% of the way home after defining the key webid > terms in a stable place > > Just wondering what folks think on this path, if removing turtle=MUST it's > a non-starter, it would be good to establish early. And that gives us > better clarity to get the modernized definitions and spec over the line, > modulo a few compromises. >
Received on Saturday, 6 January 2024 16:42:30 UTC