- From: Erich Bremer <erich@ebremer.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 15:29:30 -0400
- To: Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAFt6ea12O3g06EN3cK5npSu2MSCrhkvJRtmTHU8sAU-kTNaE1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi everyone, I was involved a bit with WebID more than 10 years ago, contributing some feedback to the spec documents and creating implementations of WebID (like https://github.com/ebremer/webid4vivo). Life took me away, but the winds of change brought me back....to find out the group might close? I think that would be a terrible loss. I literally just got my webid working again the other day (thanks to Kingsley's WebID-TLS validation service)! I don't know you Jacopo, but from what I've read so far, you have done a lot of great work for this CG, and so, much respect and thanks to you! I sincerely hope you change your mind whether as chair, editor, or just an active participant. I'm still catching up with all of the changes, but I hope to contribute to the CG technically and socially. - Erich On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 7:46 AM Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com> wrote: > Hello Kingsley, > > Thank you for your kind support. > > > I would encourage a vote that includes a majority of group participants > > I’m not going to call for such a vote myself, mostly because of the > inherent conflict of interest. However, I am still chair, if only for the > formalities; if anyone wishes to call for such a vote, go ahead. > > I would suggest, though feel free to disregard my words, to keep it > relatively simple. How to handle disagreement is already well defined in > our process, which is based on lazy consensus as defined by W3C Process > Document [2] and defers to the latter for anything that it doesn’t > explicitly address. > > Something like “do you find that the progress made since 2023-11-30 to > comply with our process [1] and to be a legitimate continuation of the > group’s previous work?” ought to be more than enough. Also, note that the > group has 73 participants [3]; it’s highly unlikely for an absolute > majority of us to pitch in. However, that wouldn’t really be necessary as > long as we get a decent number of people from the silent majority to speak > their mind. > > Just my 2 cents. > > Best, > Jacopo. > > PS: for those who celebrate Easter, whether in the religious spirit of it > of just as a yearly occasion to gather with friends and family, I hope you > had a good Easter weekend! > > [1]: https://github.com/w3c/WebID/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md > [2]: https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20231103/ > [3]: https://www.w3.org/community/webid/participants > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2024 19:29:45 UTC