- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 18:41:35 +0200
- To: Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLbhG+w0tyvg_kcmvcCsG6k2u36dE-iOxnNaPvhnpr1DQ@mail.gmail.com>
čt 15. 6. 2023 v 18:28 odesílatel Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com> napsal: > > > Solid I believe mandates conneg, and BOTH Turthe and JSON-LD. So > anything in WebID will have to work with that reality. There might be some > text that accommodates both, but it would have to be done quickly and get > consensus. > > > Based on prior discussions both here and on GitHub, I think that this > comment https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3#issuecomment-1279931734 > still represents a good chunk of shared ground that is also compatible with > Solid, at least insofar as I understand. It might or might not be useful as > a starting point. Reading through that entire conversation is quite useful > to quickly get an idea of where some of us stand. > It might make sense for Jacopo as Editor to be the spokesperson for the group during the handover, and reflecting the current consensus across the many discussions. I have fairly high trust that consensus would be well represented. > > That said, is there anyone in this list who’d like to take on the effort > of rallying, mediating and pushing towards WebID 1.0? If not, it would > probably be a good idea to leave it to the Solid WG. I would likely > disagree with the final outcome but mere disagreement does not push things > forward and I’ve already tried my hand - and failed - at doing so.
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2023 16:41:52 UTC