Re: Assessing consensus and our voting process

On 7/6/23 8:11 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Jacopo Scazzosi (2023-07-06 12:22:34)
>> 1. Assessing consensus by means of “lazy consensus”, in which lack of objection after sufficient notice is taken as assent
>> 2. Defining a minimum threshold of active support beyond which a vote is considered valid
> I want the least possible formalities.
>
> Given that you insist that we collectively formally declare informality,
> I hereby favor 1) over 2) in the above.
>
>   - Jonas


+1

-- 
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Home Page:http://www.openlinksw.com
Community Support:https://community.openlinksw.com
Weblogs (Blogs):
Company Blog:https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog
Virtuoso Blog:https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog
Data Access Drivers Blog:https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers

Personal Weblogs (Blogs):
Medium Blog:https://medium.com/@kidehen
Legacy Blogs:http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
               http://kidehen.blogspot.com

Profile Pages:
Pinterest:https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
Quora:https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
Twitter:https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+:https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Web Identities (WebID):
Personal:http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i
         :http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this