Re: Assessing consensus and our voting process

On Thu, 6 Jul 2023, 13:11 Jonas Smedegaard, <jonas@jones.dk> wrote:

> Quoting Jacopo Scazzosi (2023-07-06 12:22:34)
> > 1. Assessing consensus by means of “lazy consensus”, in which lack of
> objection after sufficient notice is taken as assent
> > 2. Defining a minimum threshold of active support beyond which a vote is
> considered valid
>
> I want the least possible formalities.
>
> Given that you insist that we collectively formally declare informality,
> I hereby favor 1) over 2) in the above.


+1, 4 weeks seems ample
2, is unviable when there's a moving bar of activity

Just anything at all that pivots discussions from from formalities of
process to anything productive, interesting, or implementable.