- From: Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 20:47:30 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2022 20:47:51 UTC
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, 20:12 Kingsley Idehen, <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 1/27/22 1:18 PM, Jacopo Scazzosi wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Hi Jacopo, > > > > >> Could we come to a consensus that content negotiation is optional for > >> current and future WebID work? > > I agree that it should remain optional, as per the current WebID > spec/draft: > > > > a) conneg tends to be incompatible with hosting of static resources > > b) conneg comes with its own complexity, which should not be forced upon > > adopters of the spec > > > Content Negotiation is an implementation detail that has no business > being in the WebID spec. > +1 >
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2022 20:47:51 UTC