Re: Domain of :key

On 29 March 2013 16:41, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> On 3/29/13 11:28 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>> Fair enough, but I think I have enough now to start working.  Once you
>> see agents making payments you may change your mind.
>>
>> You seem to be resistant to even slight changes in the cert ontology
>> (which I had thought was a community effort).  This does indeed make me
>> think that using something else such as the sec ontology and/or making my
>> own makes more sense.
>>
>> We can just raise the domain of cert : key ( foaf : Agent or rdfs :
>> Resource )  with the group and reach a consensus.
>>
>
> The Web of Linked Data is fork friendly due to it being inherently "horses
> for courses" compliant. Just make your own ontology and hook into relevant
> bits of relevant third party ontologies, when modelling a specific world
> view.
>
> The biggest misconception we have re. the Semantic Web is the notion of a
> golden ontology. There's no such thing as perfect data and as a result
> there can never be a perfect ontology.
>
> Building and using an ontology is the quickest part to ironing out quirks.
> It trumps mailing list debates any day.
>
> Everything on the Web ultimately speaks for itself via adoption :-)
>

Kingsley, totally agree.

I simply wanted to reuse where possible, to avoid reinventing the wheel.

Not not be a debate, and I dont even think there has been one :)


>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/**blog/~kidehen<http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen>
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/**112399767740508618350/about<https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about>
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/**kidehen<http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen>
>
>
>
>
>
>