- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:49:42 +0100
- To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Cc: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 15:50:11 UTC
On 29 March 2013 16:48, Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl> wrote: > 29.03.2013 16:28, Melvin Carvalho: > > We can just raise the domain of cert : key ( foaf : Agent or rdfs : >> Resource ) with the group and reach a consensus. >> > > Maybe it's a good time to vote? On the table we have: > 1. foaf:Agent > 2. owl:Thing > 3. rdfs:Resource > My votes: 1. foaf:Agent -1 2. owl:Thing +1 3. rdfs:Resource +1 > > IMHO 2 and 3 is too vague, especially rdfs:Resource, which can be class, > property or individual (from ontology point of view) [1]. > > The Semantic Web and Linked Data environment is a set of independent > agents possessing local resources of decentralised and scattered knowledge. > It that meaning foaf:Agent is ok to me. > My votes: > 1. foaf:Agent +0.9 > 2. owl:Thing -0.1 > 3. rdfs:Resource -0.5 > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-rdf-**based-semantics/** > Owl2RdfBasedSemanticsPartsHier**archy.png<http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-rdf-based-semantics/Owl2RdfBasedSemanticsPartsHierarchy.png> > > Regards, > > -- > Dominik Tomaszuk > Research Fellow > University of Bialystok > Poland >
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 15:50:11 UTC