- From: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:48:17 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
29.03.2013 16:28, Melvin Carvalho: > We can just raise the domain of cert : key ( foaf : Agent or rdfs : > Resource ) with the group and reach a consensus. Maybe it's a good time to vote? On the table we have: 1. foaf:Agent 2. owl:Thing 3. rdfs:Resource IMHO 2 and 3 is too vague, especially rdfs:Resource, which can be class, property or individual (from ontology point of view) [1]. The Semantic Web and Linked Data environment is a set of independent agents possessing local resources of decentralised and scattered knowledge. It that meaning foaf:Agent is ok to me. My votes: 1. foaf:Agent +0.9 2. owl:Thing -0.1 3. rdfs:Resource -0.5 [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-rdf-based-semantics/Owl2RdfBasedSemanticsPartsHierarchy.png Regards, -- Dominik Tomaszuk Research Fellow University of Bialystok Poland
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 15:48:46 UTC